Dustin||21||guy||recovering dumpster fire

Why should I subscribe to a channel just because the owner is black?
Anonymous

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

proudblackconservative:

edwardspoonhands:

Because sometimes we forget that we hear a very narrow band of perspectives in our media because we often choose the voices and creators we most easily identify with. And if we only hear the same perspectives, those voices start to seem like the only ones that are legitimate…or that exist.

There are a lot of different perspectives in the U.S. and black people in particular have a very different American Experience than white people. So, listening to a diversity of voices might just be, I dunno, like…interesting? Enriching? Useful? All that stuff.

Link to Post this is Referencing.

I am black, and I subscribe to channels belonging to black people, white people, Americans, British people, Middle Eastern people, Christians, Sikhs, agnostics, straight, trans, gay, and plenty of people with lots of other treats I probably don’t know about. Do you know why I subscribe to these channels? Because they produce content that I find interesting. Now I guess as a black person my intellect is apparently far superior to that of white people, but something tells me that white people are equally capable of following channels based on their interest regardless of what the channel owner looks like, and thus brow beating people into following channels simply because they belong to black content producers is a fairly empty gesture that won’t serve to make anybody less racist, and naïvely assumes that people only subscribe to YouTube channels based on race.

A+. Encourage quality, not identity

  1. queenofeverythinggeek reblogged this from libertarirynn
  2. thatcatholicgentleman reblogged this from ingmarbergmanz
  3. nightcoremoon reblogged this from etanwa and added:
    perhaps op would have been better off saying there are lots of youtubers who are black and deserve more followers and...
  4. etanwa reblogged this from libertarirynn
  5. the-cincinnati-conservative reblogged this from libertarirynn
  6. divinejusticespiritual reblogged this from libertarirynn
  7. starkent321 reblogged this from libertarirynn
  8. valarie-lynn reblogged this from libertarirynn and added:
    Not to mention the list linked to says nothing about their content whatsoever and includes racists such as Franchesca...
  9. wolfbrotherzach reblogged this from libertarirynn
  10. birepublicangirl reblogged this from libertarirynn
  11. ingmarbergmanz reblogged this from libertarirynn
  12. pieiznotreal reblogged this from libertarirynn
  13. scarletgoldenthorn reblogged this from libertarirynn
  14. libertarirynn reblogged this from libertarirynn
  15. nmoan reblogged this from edwardspoonhands
  16. furious-imperator reblogged this from edwardspoonhands
  17. looneycapricorn reblogged this from fellowship-of-the-patriarchy
  18. kchauder reblogged this from edwardspoonhands
  19. edwardspoonhands posted this